Is it better to outsource your marketing or keep it in-house?
Marketing is a core area for small businesses and many are doing it on their own. Is outsourcing most of your marketing a good option? What about having a full team in-house? What's the pro and cons for each option?
Given the complexity and range of skills required for marketing the ideal setup is a mixture of both inhouse and outsourcing.
Having your own inhouse expertise, even if its only one person, gives you better understanding of how marketing works for your business. You can be more responsive, get feedback directly on what works and what doesn't and its more sustainable over the longer term. Even if the marketing person you have leaves then you will still retain whatever structures and resources they've put in place.
A better setup is to have your own inhouse marketing person in conjunction with a marketing coach or consultant so that person is supported and you can have consistency if personnel changes.
The alternative is soley using an agency or outsourced talent. Often this happens because a business owner feels overwhelmed by marketing and just wants it "handled", preferably other there, out of sight. And of course, that can work well. But if it doesn't or the agency wants to focus on different clients or any other changes happen and you stop working with them, then what have you got? Often, not a lot. All the ideas and knowhow is usually gone too and you're back to the beginning.
I have a guide to seeking marketing help that I'll be releasing in the next few weeks. If you want a copy let me know and I can forward a copy to you. It lays out the pros and cons of each approach and what sort of businesses suit each option.
Let's look at your question from a more strategic, and high level perspective
Over the past 2-3 decades, businesses have brought in external experts to drive certain functions of the business. Those service providers (Lawyers, Accountants, HR / Recruitment executives, amongst others) have shown tremendous value to smaller businesses on a part-time basis.
Generally speaking, Small & Medium Enterprises (SME’s) can’t afford to employ Chief [anything] Officer. Typically, the Managing Director / Owner, who sometimes title himself/herself as CEO, is very lonely in the C Suite. Such businesses employ the services of an accounting firm to manage finances, a legal firm for legal work, etc.
However, In the marketing space, businesses typically use various agencies to perform various tactical duties, and use an internal resource (young and inexpensive) to manage those relationships and tactical work.
Sometimes there will be a marketing agency who oversees all that tactical work, handling bits and pieces of promotional work, branding, social media, websites and optimisation etc.
What’s missing? An experienced, strategic marketer (such as the qualified Lawyer or Accountant), acting as an outsourced CMO, drive strategy and manage the tactical execution, and be responsible and accountable for the work of the marketing function within the business.
If you’re unsure, here’s what a senior, part-time CMO can bring to a Small / Medium size business:
- Corporate level overall marketing expertise – Client acquisition, retention and expansion strategies and tactics, Pricing, Promotions, targeting, product / services mix, etc.
- Strategic experience – help define / refine the business marketing strategy
- Free up MD/CEO time to manage the business.
- Tell the forest from the trees – as a strategic advisor to the business, the CMO can bring the most appropriate service providers, and orchestrate activities.
- Responsible executive to handle budgets and P/L.
- Contacts – both high-level and suppliers. This is often an overlooked benefit, but most marketers will have a sizeable network.
- Fresh eyes – an outsourced CMO would typically work with a variety of businesses and can outsmart the competition by using tactics used by other industries.
Hope this helps your thinking in a broader sense.
This is an important question and one which is asked by businesses of all sizes, with pros and cons for both sides of the argument.
When bringing on an agency, it is usually to plug a skills gap within a business. Outside expertise used to solve a problem identified as a hurdle to the next stage of growth. Agencies exist to provide this expertise, we spend our time honing our craft and learning the advantages, efficiencies and how to navigate different problems within any particular discipline. Working with a variety of company sizes and industries, we get to experience a wide breadth of knowledge and bring that into your business.
However, like any business, agencies are still there to make money for their owners and staff, so it's important that they're incentivised correctly, in a way which is aligned to your business goals.
With internal marketing functions, you can have far more confidence that their goals and your business' are aligned, all pulling in the same direction. However, by focusing on a more narrow grouping of problems, in-house teams aren't exposed to the broad array of problems across all the disciplines in your marketing mix. They simply can't be. It's also much easier to fire an underperforming agency than it is an employee.
At the end of the day, agencies are great solutions to plug gaps in your business and bring expertise which is lacking. Ideas which will help boost you to the next stage of growth. As long as the roles and responsibilities are clear and everyone is working towards a clear strategic vision, each business will find the mix which is right for them.
You have one chance to make a great first impression so if you are launching a busioess, website, new product or service and you do not have the right expertise in house then it is time to bring in professionals who can help. Don't risk diluting your brand or putting your business in a position where it will cost more money and time to get the right words and pictures out there to tell your story. If you need help ask for it, it is rarely too early and often too late in my experience. Good luck!
From 27 years of marketing experience and testing 1,000+ different peices I recommend a split of both.
I've taught 1,000+ business owners how to measure their marketing and less than 2% of all businesses really do so comprehensively. As a result very little marketing is actually proven to work so there's theory and opinions everywhere.
8 out of 10 businesses have not received top quality marketing and aren't aware of it. All they know is they spent a lot of money but don't see an increase or much increase in their sales.
I highly recommend every business track their leads, to sales, conversion rates and Acquisition Cost of buying customers from advertising. Without measuring its a bit like winning the lottery in terms of choosing an effective marketing service company.
I recommend business owners pay money to learn marketing. Not necessarily to do it all themselves, but to understand the basics so they aren't completely ignorant when they go to pay a marketing company.
This includes understanding ingredients of the most common, but most poorly executed marketing strategy there is, a website.
Nearly every website has significant marketing 'flaws' that prevent it generating the leads that it could.
An education on marketing isn't expensive, but ignorance sure is. Learn what the basics of marketing are and you only need to do so once, to benefit for how many years you are intend to own a business.
I've invested over $120,000 in learning about business growth and marketing. It has been the best investment of my life.
If you pay for a website invest some money in education on effective website design. Pay for copywriting too because these days its very poor on the majority of websites. People don't buy or are influenced to buy from a business based on its facts or features. They buy benefits.
These days nearly every website is "we" focused, describing what they do. That's a feature, not a business.
Understanding this and applying the principles can increase traffic to a website by 30% in a month, just by rewriting it. Facts from measuring prove it.
If you tried to hire a cabinet maker for your business, but knew nothing about cabinet making, what success do you think you'd have with finding a good cabinet marker to hire?
That's exactly the same with paying for a marketing company. Pay once and benefit for a decade or two, or pay and "hope" - that's the choice in business.
There are so many things to consider when looking at both options, for example:
- your budget and ongoing commitment
- what you need them to do, the complexity and how long you need assistance with it
- recruiting a company, or staff member to do this, and your experience in both
- you need to have some knowledge and understanding to manage both the outsourced provider or the staff member you wish to employ.