Why do Australian startups fail?
Some of the challenges are mentioned in this article.
I agree with Phil.
I don't think it's so much that Aus startups fail - Australia just has a really poor way of assisting startups.
1. Risk averse investors: Australians are too risk averse to put their money into 'unknowns' or 'no immediate revenue' models. Returns are demanded from day one meaning that any business that needs VC at seed stage has to go overseas or bootstrap.
2. Government doesn't support: Commercialisation Australia brought some great startups through the early stages. Now that is gone there is a list of potential investors to approach. Compare to other countries especially Singapore where there is a real incubator mentality for start-ups including massive tax breaks and a good investing environment, Australia has squandered the opportunity to be a startup hub.
3. Cost of doing business: It is just so damned expensive to do anything from registering a domain name through to asset purchases not to mention wages for the highly skilled workforce generally required especially for tech startups.
4. Further to Phils point about economies of scale - I have seen a lot of good ideas spawned that could be scaled up globally, but the heartbreak of funding and capital usually sees those ideas go by the way-side and eventually picked up somewhere in the world where investors are willing to take a chance.
Until VC's and Angels become a little less averse, and the government looks at startups differently, we will continue to see domination of large corporations and strangulation of progress. IMHO.
Phil Joel Director at SavvySME
I think the primary reasons are (1) we are a small nation so there is smaller economy of scale (2) very expensive to do business so cost per unit is much higher (3) un-supportive environment so the odds are not in startup's favour from the outset.
Brian Mallyon Owner at Luckypole Limited
Two things strike me about the comments above.
1. They are probably more reasons why startups don't start in the first place rather than the reasons they fail.
2. They apportion blame to possible outside influences.
Some of those things may be factors, but a well researched startup already knows about the support available, it knows the size of the potential market and it knows the cost of doing business.
And if they haven't considered these factors, then perhaps more of the blame for failures rests with the startup for not doing adequate preparation to weigh up the potential of the business.